return to homepage
return to updates
the fifth quantum field
by Miles Mathis
Abstract: I will show the five vectors created by any quantum in non-circular motion. Using only the mechanics of stacked spins, I will provide the simple visualization beneath the quantum equation.
This paper addresses a very old problem. Schrodinger and Heisenberg argued about the assignment of hidden fields or variables, and the problem remains today. The more we have learned about quantum interaction, the more we have recognized the action of hidden fields. We now have various names for these hidden fields in various interactions. Sometimes we call them CP parity fields, sometimes flavor fields, sometimes color fields, etc. In the standard model, these fields are never mechanically assigned. A math is rigged to contain them and the experiments go on. But I will show the simple mechanical explanation of five related fields, all caused by spin.
In other papers I have uncovered 4 stacked spins as the explanation of superposition, as the explanation of neutron/proton variation, and as the explanation of meson composition. In this paper I will mainly extract and highlight information I relate in those other papers. But I will also be able to clarify the physical relation of all the vectors.
Specifically, my study of the meson allowed me to isolate the fifth field. It is not a fifth spin, but the relation of the linear motion to the four spins. If you will remember, we have an axial spin, and then the x, y, and z spins. Each spin is orthogonal to all the others. Baryons have all four spins, mesons lack the z-spin, and electrons have only the inner two (or only the axial, when at rest). Quantum particles over the baryon energy have unstable spins on top of the z spin. But in studying these stacked spins, I discovered that we must also include the linear motion of the particle. That is to say, the four spins need not follow the linear motion in only one way. We have only so many dimensions, so the linear motion must follow one of the spins, it is true. But there is a choice even here.
In my first analyses, I had let the linear motion match the axial spin, limiting myself to four vectors. In other words, if the axial spin were in the zx plane, I let the linear motion be either z or x. This allowed me to ignore it in the math. But when studying certain mesons, the linear motion poked its head in once more. It became clear that in some meson compositions, the linear motion was acting as a fifth vector, giving us more possible states.
A reader suggested the solution to this. It was pointed out to me that a top or gyroscope not only resists a second axial spin, it also resists certain end over end spins. A top will not spin two ways at once, but it also will not fall over. This means that if we assign the spin axis to y, the top resists falling in the yz and yx planes. So we must choose the end over end spin to be in the zx plane. This applies to all spin relations, so it would appear we have no choice in the linear motion relative to the others. This had been my first assumption. But this is not true. Each spin can either be CW or CCW, and the linear motion can link with either one. This gives us a fifth variation, and requires us to monitor five vectors in every quantum composition. This is our fifth "field".
I have already shown that this must give us 32 baryon states, since five vectors must give us 25 combinations. This does not mean we are limited to 32 mesons, however, since I have shown that other factors come into play during collision, including the possible momentary loss of inner spins in sideways collisions (or the influence of orthogonal fields that target inner spins). Quanta may also huddle momentarily in high energy fields, being driven by field "winds" into temporary states of stability. So some mesons are multiples.
Now that I have simply and mechanically assigned the five fields, we no longer need to talk of hidden variables. I have shown both the math and the physical causes of the math, and we no longer have a fuzzy duality, or any need of unmechanical terms like flavor or color. The parity quantum numbers are now physically assigned as well, and we can ditch CP parity and everything surrounding it. I have built a solid foundation for QED, QCD and electromagnetics, and we can begin the rather large task of reworking all the equations and trimming all the excess theory and math.
Although I appear, for the moment at least, to have found all the quantum vectors, I CAN show a sixth vector for electrons in orbit. As I already pointed out in my paper on Schrodinger's equation, the way the orbit is created by the unified field must give us another wave to work with. This wave will give us another vector at any dt, for a total of six. That is six fields for an orbiting particle and five for a particle in linear or near-linear motion.
The fifth quantum field may also be called the fifth dimension, if you like. In this way I have given a simple explanation of the heretofore mysterious and esoteric fifth dimension. The standard model had traded one set of esoterica for another, but I have dissolved both mysteries.
If this paper was useful to you in any way, please consider donating a dollar (or more) to the SAVE THE ARTISTS FOUNDATION. This will allow me to continue writing these "unpublishable" things. Don't be confused by paying Melisa Smith--that is just one of my many noms de plume. If you are a Paypal user, there is no fee; so it might be worth your while to become one. Otherwise they will rob us 33 cents for each transaction.