
return to homepage return
to updates
THE GRAND
UNIFICATION THEORY
by Miles Mathis
Many have
asked me if my theory is a GUT, or a grand unified theory. So far,
I have not sold it as one, and that is because I was offended by
the GUT's that came before. They were so wrongheaded and
presumptuous, I wanted to have nothing to do with the whole idea.
But I have had to field so many questions about this, I have
decided to write a short paper about it.
A GUT is
currently defined as a theory that would combine the four existing
fundamental forces, those being gravity, E/M, strong and weak. A
successful GUT would combine not only the current theories, but
the current maths. Well, I certainly can't claim to have done
that, since I have shown that two of those forces don't even
exist. I have ditched the strong force as unnecessary, since we
have no data indicating that the E/M field exists in the nucleus
in the way we have been told. The strong force was postulated to
counteract E/M in the nucleus, but a better theory is that it does
not exist there as a repulsive force. I
have shown mechanically and logically why it wouldn't exist there
in that way, so all the work done on the strong force has just
been busywork. [Also see my
new papers on nuclear charge channeling.] This works out well,
since the strong force is the most tenuous of the four. The math
and theory underlying the strong force are razor thin, and very
little is lost in jettisoning it.
The same can be said for
the weak force. Although something is going on with the weak
force, and it hasn't been made up from whole cloth like the strong
force, it turns out that current theory was right to backslide
into electroweak theory. The weak force was initially sold as an
independent force of nature, but after the Nobel Prizes were
awarded, the theorists admitted that the weak force was probably
just a comrade of E/M. They were right in that. The
weak force isn't a force at all, it is just a fluctuation in
the E/M field seen in certain collisions (beta “decay”, kaon
decay and so on). It is a variation in the charge field, and of
course the charge field is E/M. The charge field is
photons, and the variation seen in socalled weak
interactions is mediated by photons directly.
Furthermore,
I can't and don't want to claim that I have unified the various
mainstream maths. Rather, I
have shown that most of them need to be swept out the door. I
have no use for gauge math or tensor math or Hamiltonians or
renormalization. All that is just a laser show to keep your eyes
off the mess. I have kept a large part of Newton's and Einstein's
and even Schrodinger's field equations, but I have shown that
important parts of all three have to be excised or whipped into
shape. With some major nudges here and there, I have been able to
unify gravity and E/M. The biggest nudge was recognizing that
G was a scaling constant in Newton's gravity equation, and
that E/M had always been included in the classical field
equations. This alone allowed me to rewrite all the basic field
equations, and to correct literally hundreds of lesser equations
in related problems and experiments. Another big nudge was the
correction to the angular
equations, which had been wrong from the beginning. This
allowed for another round of important corrections. Finally,
replacing quarks with
spins allowed me to clean up the greater messes of QED and
QCD, simplifying both. Giving the photon spin allowed me to
explain magnetism, and giving the photon a radius and a mass
allowed me to solve galactic
and cosmic problems in a simple and straightforward way. I
recently showed that dark matter is actually just the charge
field.
So you can see that the longsoughtafter GUT was
achieved in a way no one predicted. The four forces were unified
by throwing one out, redefining another, and realizing that the
other two had been unified from the beginning. In the same way,
the maths were unified by throwing most of them out and starting
over from scratch. I didn't unify renormalized maths with tensor
fields, I went back and reformulated a quantum math that was
normal to begin with. I did this by throwing out the point and the
point particle. And what allowed me to do that was realizing that
the calculus was misdefined and misused. I had to
correct the calculus, and once I did that I no longer needed
to renormalize. Likewise with the tensor field. The same
correction to the calculus changed the fundaments of the tensor
field, so that no matter whether you wished to use curves or
straight lines, you could no longer use mass points. The
tensor, like the vector, was redefined as a clear differential
or length, and that changed all the postulates and therefore all
the solutions. The tensor field also had to be nudged by
correcting and extending the
time and length transforms, and this clarified the entire
field once more.
Strictly, my unification is even broader
than any previously attempted or imagined GUT's. I have done
things they didn't even realize needed to be done. This is
because, in order to unify, I saw that it was necessary to correct
many longstanding basic
equations that had become dogma. The housecleaning was even
wider and deeper than anyone imagined, and all sorts of fortified
towers have fallen.
That said, I believe I maintain a
good deal more humility than those who came before, since I make
no claims to a complete or final solution. My unification covers a
lot of territory, but it is in no way a Final Theory, a complete
theory, or, as Bohr said of his interpretation, "The best we
can expect." I have cleaned up a lot of messes, but I have
only just begun. Even after a decade of work, what I don't know
dwarfs what I do know. Neither this unification nor any other
takes us much nearer physical omniscience, and we had best admit
it. We will not know all there is to know about physics in ten
years or ten thousand. I do not claim to have peeked into the mind
of God, gods, or nature, since that is all far beyond me. I only
claim to have made some important progress in the understanding of
human equations and theory. These titans of academia we hear so
much about failed to solve all these problems, and yet still
claimed to know almost everything. I have solved many of their
problems for them, handing them their desired GUT on a silver
platter, and yet I admit to knowing almost nothing in the "grand"
scheme of things. I may be confident in the company of men, but in
the presence of gods, eternity, nature, or truth, I know my place.
If this paper was useful to you in
any way, please consider donating a dollar (or more) to the SAVE
THE ARTISTS FOUNDATION. This will allow me to continue writing
these "unpublishable" things. I have joined the boycott
against Paypal, and suggest you use Amazon instead. It is free and
does not enrich any bankers. AMAZON
WEBPAY donate from your cellphone or computer donate to
mm@milesmathis.com.
